Comparison of upper tropospheric carbon monoxide from MOPITT, ACE-FTS, and HIPPO-QCLS

AMS Citation:
Martinez-Alonso, S., and Coauthors, 2014: Comparison of upper tropospheric carbon monoxide from MOPITT, ACE-FTS, and HIPPO-QCLS. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres, 119, 14144-14164, doi:10.1002/2014JD022397.
Date:2014-12-27
Resource Type:article
Title:Comparison of upper tropospheric carbon monoxide from MOPITT, ACE-FTS, and HIPPO-QCLS
Abstract: Products from the Measurements Of Pollution In The Troposphere (MOPITT) instrument are regularly validated using in situ airborne measurements. However, few of these measurements reach into the upper troposphere, thus hindering MOPITT validation in that region. Here we evaluate upper tropospheric (~500 hPa to the tropopause) MOPITT CO profiles by comparing them to satellite Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment Fourier Transform Spectrometer (ACE-FTS) retrievals and to measurements from the High-performance Instrumented Airborne Platform for Environmental Research Pole to Pole Observations (HIPPO) Quantum Cascade Laser Spectrometer (QCLS). Direct comparison of colocated v5 MOPITT thermal infrared-only retrievals, v3.0 ACE-FTS retrievals, and HIPPO-QCLS measurements shows a slight positive MOPITT CO bias within its 10% accuracy requirement with respect to the other two data sets. Direct comparison of colocated ACE-FTS and HIPPO-QCLS measurements results in a small number of samples due to the large disparity in sampling pattern and density of these data sets. Thus, two additional indirect techniques for comparison of noncoincident data sets have been applied: tracer-tracer (CO-O₃) correlation analysis and analysis of profiles in tropopause coordinates. These techniques suggest a negative bias of ACE-FTS with respect to HIPPO-QCLS; this could be caused by differences in resolution (horizontal, vertical) or by deficiencies in the ACE-FTS CO retrievals below ~20 km of altitude, among others. We also investigate the temporal stability of MOPITT and ACE-FTS data, which provide unique global CO records and are thus important in climate analysis. Our results indicate that the relative bias between the two data sets has remained generally stable during the 2004-2010 period.
Peer Review:Refereed
Copyright Information:Copyright 2014 American Geophysical Union.
OpenSky citable URL: ark:/85065/d70k29k3
Publisher's Version: 10.1002/2014JD022397
Author(s):
  • Sara Martinez-Alonso - NCAR/UCAR
  • Merritt Deeter - NCAR/UCAR
  • Helen Worden - NCAR/UCAR
  • John Gille - NCAR/UCAR
  • Louisa Emmons - NCAR/UCAR
  • L. Pan - NCAR/UCAR
  • Mijeong Park - NCAR/UCAR
  • Gloria Manney
  • Peter Bernath
  • Chris Boone
  • Kaley Walker
  • Felicia Kolonjari
  • Steven Wofsy
  • Jasna Pittman
  • Bruce Daube
  • Random Profile

    SOFT ENG/PROG III

    Recent & Upcoming Visitors