A comparison between gravity wave momentum fluxes in observations and climate models

AMS Citation:
Geller, M. A., and Coauthors, 2013: A comparison between gravity wave momentum fluxes in observations and climate models. Journal of Climate, 26, 6383-6405, doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00545.1.
Date:2013-09-01
Resource Type:article
Title:A comparison between gravity wave momentum fluxes in observations and climate models
Abstract: For the first time, a formal comparison is made between gravity wave momentum fluxes in models and those derived from observations. Although gravity waves occur over a wide range of spatial and temporal scales, the focus of this paper is on scales that are being parameterized in present climate models, sub-1000-km scales. Only observational methods that permit derivation of gravity wave momentum fluxes over large geographical areas are discussed, and these are from satellite temperature measurements, constant-density long-duration balloons, and high-vertical-resolution radiosonde data. The models discussed include two high-resolution models in which gravity waves are explicitly modeled, Kanto and the Community Atmosphere Model, version 5 (CAM5), and three climate models containing gravity wave parameterizations, MAECHAM5, Hadley Centre Global Environmental Model 3 (HadGEM3), and the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) model. Measurements generally show similar flux magnitudes as in models, except that the fluxes derived from satellite measurements fall off more rapidly with height. This is likely due to limitations on the observable range of wavelengths, although other factors may contribute. When one accounts for this more rapid fall off, the geographical distribution of the fluxes from observations and models compare reasonably well, except for certain features that depend on the specification of the nonorographic gravity wave source functions in the climate models. For instance, both the observed fluxes and those in the high-resolution models are very small at summer high latitudes, but this is not the case for some of the climate models. This comparison between gravity wave fluxes from climate models, high-resolution models, and fluxes derived from observations indicates that such efforts offer a promising path toward improving specifications of gravity wave sources in climate models.
Subject(s):Gravity waves, Climate models
Peer Review:Refereed
Copyright Information:Copyright 2013 American Meteorological Society (AMS). Permission to use figures, tables, and brief excerpts from this work in scientific and educational works is hereby granted provided that the source is acknowledged. Any use of material in this work that is determined to be "fair use" under Section 107 or that satisfies the conditions specified in Section 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law (17 USC, as revised by P.L. 94-553) does not require the Society's permission. Republication, systematic reproduction, posting in electronic form on servers, or other uses of this material, except as exempted by the above statements, requires written permission or license from the AMS. Additional details are provided in the AMS Copyright Policies, available from the AMS at 617-227-2425 or amspubs@ametsoc.org. Permission to place a copy of this work on this server has been provided by the AMS. The AMS does not guarantee that the copy provided here is an accurate copy of the published work.
OpenSky citable URL: ark:/85065/d75t3mcg
Publisher's Version: 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00545.1
Author(s):
  • M. Geller
  • M. Alexander
  • P. Love
  • Julio Bacmeister - NCAR/UCAR
  • M. Ern
  • A. Hertzo
  • E. Manzini
  • P. Preusse
  • K. Sato
  • A. Scaife
  • T. Zhou
  • Random Profile

    SENIOR SCIENTIST

    Recent & Upcoming Visitors