Experiences with 0 - 36-h explicit convective forecasts with the WRF-ARW model

AMS Citation:
Weisman, M. L., C. A. Davis, W. Wang, K. W. Manning, and J. B. Klemp, 2008: Experiences with 0 - 36-h explicit convective forecasts with the WRF-ARW model. Weather and Forecasting, 23, 407-437, doi:10.1175/2007WAF2007005.1.
Date:2008-06-01
Resource Type:article
Title:Experiences with 0 - 36-h explicit convective forecasts with the WRF-ARW model
Abstract: Herein, a summary of the authors' experiences with 36-h real-time explicit (4 km) convective forecasts with the Advanced Research Weather Research and Forecasting Model (WRF-ARW) during the 2003 - 05 spring and summer seasons is presented. These forecasts are compared to guidance obtained from the 12-km operational Eta Model, which employed convective parameterization (e.g., Betts - Miller - Janjić). The results suggest significant value added for the high-resolution forecasts in representing the convective system mode (e.g., for squall lines, bow echoes, mesoscale convective vortices) as well as in representing the diurnal convective cycle. However, no improvement could be documented in the overall guidance as to the timing and location of significant convective outbreaks. Perhaps the most notable result is the overall strong correspondence between the Eta and WRF-ARW guidance, for both good and bad forecasts, suggesting the overriding influence of larger scales of forcing on convective development in the 24 - 36-h time frame. Sensitivities to PBL, land surface, microphysics, and resolution failed to account for the more significant forecast errors (e.g., completely missing or erroneous convective systems), suggesting that further research is needed to document the source of such errors at these time scales. A systematic bias is also noted with the Yonsei University (YSU) PBL scheme, emphasizing the continuing need to refine and improve physics packages for application to these forecast problems.
Subject(s):Model comparison, Convection
Peer Review:Refereed
Copyright Information:Copyright 2008 American Meteorological Society (AMS). Permission to use figures, tables, and brief excerpts from this work in scientific and educational works is hereby granted provided that the source is acknowledged. Any use of material in this work that is determined to be "fair use" under Section 107 or that satisfies the conditions specified in Section 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law (17 USC, as revised by P.L. 94-553) does not require the Society's permission. Republication, systematic reproduction, posting in electronic form on servers, or other uses of this material, except as exempted by the above statements, requires written permission or license from the AMS. Additional details are provided in the AMS Copyright Policies, available from the AMS at 617-227-2425 or amspubs@ametsoc.org. Permission to place a copy of this work on this server has been provided by the AMS. The AMS does not guarantee that the copy provided here is an accurate copy of the published work.
OpenSky citable URL: ark:/85065/d75m65xb
Publisher's Version: 10.1175/2007WAF2007005.1
Author(s):
  • Morris Weisman - NCAR/UCAR
  • Christopher Davis - NCAR/UCAR
  • Wei Wang - NCAR/UCAR
  • Kevin Manning - NCAR/UCAR
  • Joseph Klemp - NCAR/UCAR
  • Random Profile

    Recent & Upcoming Visitors