Special MMM/GTP Joint Seminar - Weather, Macroweather, Climate: reuniting Richardson's strands

*Special MMM/GTP Joint Seminar - Thursday, November 14, 2019 - 3:30pm

*Please note special location - FL2/1001 Small Auditorium

Speaker: Shaun Lovejoy

Affiliation: McGill University, MontréalQuébec

     A hundred years ago, Lewis Fry Richardson made the first numerical weather forecast, founding the field of numerical weather prediction (NWP).  Based on deterministic continuum mechanics, today it is not only ubiquitous in daily weather forecasts, but has been extended to seasonal predictions through to multidecadal climate projections. 

    But Richardson also pioneered the development of high level turbulent laws.  In 1926 he proposed the “Richardson 4/3 law” of turbulent diffusion, a law that wasn’t vindicated until 2013.   Whereas NWP attempts to account for every whirl, cloud, eddy, structure, the 4/3 law exploits the idea of scaling to statistically account for the collective outcome of billions upon billions of structures jointly acting from millimetres up to the size of the planet. 

    The idea that high-level statistical laws could explain the actions of myriads of vortices, cells and structures was shared by successive generations of turbulence scientists.  Unfortunately, they faced monumental mathematical difficulties largely connected to turbulent intermittency: the fact that most of the activity (e.g. energy flux) is inside tiny, violently active regions, themselves buried in a hierarchy of structures within structures.  The application of turbulence theory to the atmosphere, encounters an additional obstacle: stratification that depends on scale. 

    The 1980’s marked a turning point when Richardson’s deterministic and statistical strands parted company, the unity of the atmospheric sciences was broken.  On the one hand, computers revolutionized NWP, on the other hand, the nonlinear revolution promised to tame chaos itself, including turbulent chaos with its fractal structures within structures. 

    In this talk, I summarize four decades of work attempting to understand atmospheric variability that occurs over an astonishing range of scales: from millimetres to the size of the planet, from milliseconds to billions of years.   The variability is so large that standard ways of dealing with it are utterly inadequate: in 2015, it was found that classical approaches had underestimated the variability by the astronomical factor of a quadrillion.  The new understanding allows us to finally reunite Richardson’s strands. 

    For example, I show that the deterministic weather models respect the stochastic scaling laws very well.  I explain “macroweather” and how it sits in between the weather and climate, finally settling the question: “What is Climate”?  I answer the question “how big is a cloud?” and show that Mars is our statistical twin and why this shouldn’t surprise us.  I explain how the multifractal butterfly effect gives rise to events that are so extreme that they have been called “black swans”. 

    By using data from the real world – not model – climate, and with the help of the Fractional Energy Balance Equation (FEBE), I explain how the emergent scaling laws can make accurate monthly to decadal (macroweather) forecasts by exploiting an unsuspected but huge memory in the atmosphere-ocean system itself.  I show how the FEBE can help to significantly reduce the large uncertainties in our current climate projections to 2050 and 2100.

Refreshments: 3:15 PM

 

 

Building:

Room Number: 
*FL2-1001 Small Auditorium

Type of event:

Will this event be webcast to the public by NCAR|UCAR?: 
Announcement Timing: 
Friday, November 8, 2019 to Thursday, November 14, 2019
Calendar Timing: 
Thursday, November 14, 2019 - 3:30pm to 4:30pm

Posted by Nancy Sue Kerner at ext. 8946, nskerner@ucar.edu

Quick Facts

NCAR is managed by the nonprofit University Corporation for Atmospheric Research on behalf of NSF and the UCAR university community.

  • NCAR is not a federal agency and its employees are not part of the federal personnel system.
  • Our activities complement those of the federal agencies and we work closely with them.

More about us