A comparison of roll and nonroll convection and the subsequent deepening moist convection: An LEM case study based on SCMS data

AMS Citation:
Huang, Q., J. H. Marsham, D. J. Parker, W. Tian, and T. Weckwerth, 2009: A comparison of roll and nonroll convection and the subsequent deepening moist convection: An LEM case study based on SCMS data. Monthly Weather Review, 137, 350-365, doi:10.1175/2008MWR2450.1.
Date:2009-01-01
Resource Type:article
Title:A comparison of roll and nonroll convection and the subsequent deepening moist convection: An LEM case study based on SCMS data
Abstract: Rolls observed during the Small Cumulus Microphysical Study (SCMS) field campaign are simulated using a large eddy model (LEM). The simulated boundary layer properties were in a good agreement with sounding profiles and aircraft observations, and the observed boundary layer rolls were reproduced by the model. Rolls started to decay when -Zi/L exceeded a threshold, with a value between 5 and 45. Here Zi and L refer to the height of the top of convective boundary layer and the Monin-Obukhov length, respectively. This value was found to depend on a nondimensional combination of the low-level wind shear, the height of the CBL, and the eddy velocity scale. Larger surface buoyancy fluxes and smaller shears gave higher thresholds. For the case modeled, rolls persisted for surface buoyancy fluxes less than 110 W m⁻³, and formed for boundary layer wind shears greater than 5 × 10 greater than s⁻¹, which is consistent with previous studies. The simulated roll convection was compared with a nonroll simulation, which was identical except for the wind and the wind shear used. In both the roll and nonroll cases the variability in convective inhibition (CIN) was dominated by the variability in the source air, rather than the lifting of the top of the boundary layer by the convection. Stronger moist updrafts existed in the nonroll convection, whereas roll convection gave a more symmetrical distribution of up and downdrafts, with stronger downdrafts than the nonroll case. The nonroll convection simulations have lower minimum values of CIN and clouds develop 15 min earlier in this case.
Subject(s):Convection, Large eddy simulations, Boundary layer
Peer Review:Refereed
Copyright Information:Copyright 2009 American Meteorological Society (AMS). Permission to use figures, tables, and brief excerpts from this work in scientific and educational works is hereby granted provided that the source is acknowledged. Any use of material in this work that is determined to be "fair use" under Section 107 or that satisfies the conditions specified in Section 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law (17 USC, as revised by P.L. 94-553) does not require the Society's permission. Republication, systematic reproduction, posting in electronic form on servers, or other uses of this material, except as exempted by the above statements, requires written permission or license from the AMS. Additional details are provided in the AMS Copyright Policies, available from the AMS at 617-227-2425 or amspubs@ametsoc.org. Permission to place a copy of this work on this server has been provided by the AMS. The AMS does not guarantee that the copy provided here is an accurate copy of the published work.
OpenSky citable URL: ark:/85065/d72b902h
Publisher's Version: 10.1175/2008MWR2450.1
Author(s):
  • Qian Huang
  • John Marsham
  • Douglas Parker
  • Wenshou Tian
  • Tammy Weckwerth - NCAR/UCAR
  • Random Profile

    SOFT ENG/PROG III

    Recent & Upcoming Visitors