An eddy injection method for large-eddy simulations of tornado-like vortices

AMS Citation:
Bryan, G. H., N. A. Dahl, D. S. Nolan, and R. Rotunno, 2017: An eddy injection method for large-eddy simulations of tornado-like vortices. Monthly Weather Review, 145, 1937-1961, doi:10.1175/MWR-D-16-0339.1.
Date:2017-05-01
Resource Type:article
Title:An eddy injection method for large-eddy simulations of tornado-like vortices
Abstract: The structure and intensity of tornado-like vortices are examined using large-eddy simulations (LES) in an idealized framework. The analysis focuses on whether the simulated boundary layer contains resolved turbulent eddies, and whether most of the vertical component of turbulent momentum flux is resolved rather than parameterized. Initial conditions are first generated numerically using a "precursor simulation'' with an axisymmetric model. A three-dimensional "baseline'' LES is then integrated using these initial conditions plus random perturbations. With this baseline approach, the inner core of the simulated vortex clearly contains resolved turbulent eddies (as expected); however, the boundary layer inflow has very weak resolved turbulent eddies, and the subgrid model accounts for most of the vertical turbulent momentum flux (contrary to the design of these simulations). To overcome this problem, a second precursor simulation is conducted in which resolved turbulent fluctuations develop within a smaller, doubly periodic LES domain. Perturbation flow fields from this precursor LES are then "injected'' into the large-domain LES at a specified radius. With this approach, the boundary layer inflow clearly contains resolved turbulent fluctuations, often organized as quasi-2D rolls, which persist into the inner core of the simulation; thus, the simulated tornado-like vortex and its inflowing boundary layer can be characterized as LES. When turbulence is injected, the inner-core vortex structure is always substantially different, the boundary layer inflow is typically deeper, and in most cases the maximum wind speeds are reduced compared to the baseline simulation.
Peer Review:Refereed
Copyright Information:Copyright 2017 American Meteorological Society (AMS). Permission to use figures, tables, and brief excerpts from this work in scientific and educational works is hereby granted provided that the source is acknowledged. Any use of material in this work that is determined to be "fair use" under Section 107 or that satisfies the conditions specified in Section 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law (17 USC, as revised by P.L. 94-553) does not require the Society's permission. Republication, systematic reproduction, posting in electronic form on servers, or other uses of this material, except as exempted by the above statements, requires written permission or license from the AMS. Additional details are provided in the AMS Copyright Policies, available from the AMS at 617-227-2425 or amspubs@ametsoc.org. Permission to place a copy of this work on this server has been provided by the AMS. The AMS does not guarantee that the copy provided here is an accurate copy of the published work.
OpenSky citable URL: ark:/85065/d7g1638x
Publisher's Version: 10.1175/MWR-D-16-0339.1
Author(s):
  • George H. Bryan - NCAR/UCAR
  • Nathan A. Dahl
  • David S. Nolan
  • Richard Rotunno - NCAR/UCAR
  • Random Profile

    PROJ SCIENTIST II

    Recent & Upcoming Visitors